|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:07:48 GMT -5
EldonJ
Everyone must remember that the summons to appear issued to the communities is not paramount to the resolution of this lawsuit. The court is simply inviting them to participate in the litigation. If they continue to kick and scream about it and Judge Lettow lets them have their way, they will have to live with whatever remedy the court sees fit. They cannot come back and say "wait, wait, wait, we never had a chance to put our 2 cents in!" The case will go on with or without them.
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:08:43 GMT -5
EldonJ
Re: according to kettering settled at the latest d
« Reply #1 on Today at 9:29pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to Erick was best case scenario: 6-8 months. Worst case scenario: 2 years. This was stated by him at the meeting at Lower Sioux back in December. Erick stated to plan for the worst case scenario
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:10:46 GMT -5
EldonJ
Everyone must remember that the summons to appear issued to the communities is not paramount to the resolution of this lawsuit. The court is simply inviting them to participate in the litigation. If they continue to kick and scream about it and Judge Lettow lets them have their way, they will have to live with whatever remedy the court sees fit. They cannot come back and say "wait, wait, wait, we never had a chance to put our 2 cents in!" The case will go on with or without them.
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:11:38 GMT -5
gotld
...and technically, because of the Dakota Journal's "partcipation" (lack there of) in this case...it took the Judge's solution (summons) to make sure a rule of the court was adhered to...that rule 14...everyone has the right to be included in this case...even the one's who can be sued. What happens with that is not my concern because the defendant in this case is the US government.
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:13:12 GMT -5
wastesni
O'Neil is the Faegre & Benson Attroney for Shakopee & Prairie Island
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:14:25 GMT -5
jmills
What does Judge Lettow mean about the Rolls Royce?
I remember Eric telling a story at a Sioux City meeting about some divorce where some lady was paying 6grand a month on a RR. Is that sort of what the Judge is talking about?
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:15:12 GMT -5
The NativeAmerican
makes ya wonder if the judge came to minnesota and played a lil blackjack
or enjoyed the buffet at mystic ?
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:16:20 GMT -5
beth623
i dont know for sure about the rolls royce thing, but the judge and lawyers seemded to refer to it as another case.
i also dont know what the reference to shosone was all about
but it is good to hear what some one else recorded, if enough of us took notes we might get everything
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:17:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:18:39 GMT -5
Bill Bucholz
You silly guys, it is another case.
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:19:17 GMT -5
The NativeAmerican
what is another case?
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:20:03 GMT -5
The NativeAmerican
Today at 5:10pm, jmills wrote:What does Judge Lettow mean about the Rolls Royce?
I remember Eric telling a story at a Sioux City meeting about some divorce where some lady was paying 6grand a month on a RR. Is that sort of what the Judge is talking about?
erick was referring about the divorce of a mr vig
he tried to use "sovereign immunity" to prevent disclosure of his
financial information in order to determine alimony
but it didnt work..
he settled out of court
and his ex ended up getting the alimony
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:20:38 GMT -5
GWeldonJr
so much for the immunity huh
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:21:15 GMT -5
RMailerKelly
Would a pre-nuptial apply to anyone receiving anything from the lands?
|
|
|
|
Post by mdenney on Jan 31, 2007 23:21:49 GMT -5
The NativeAmerican
it probably would
|
|
