|
Post by mdenney on Jul 19, 2007 19:16:39 GMT -5
Intervenor Law & Legal Definition An intervenor is a a party who does not have a substantial and direct interest but has clearly ascertainable interests and perspectives essential to a judicial determination and whose standing has been granted by the court for all or a portion of the proceedings. The following is an example of a state statute dealing with intevenors: " Sec. 4-61dd-10. Parties and intervenors (a) The complainant and the respondent shall be parties. Other persons may petition the presiding officer to participate as parties or intervenors. The presiding officer may grant party or intervenor status to any person meeting the standards of section 4-177a of the Connecticut General Statutes, and may limit an intervenor's participation as provided therein. Once granted such status, a party or intervenor, subject to any limitations imposed by the presiding officer, shall be treated like any other party to the proceedings, with the same rights and obligations attendant thereto. (b) Any party may object to the participation of another person as a party or intervenor by filing, at or before the commencement of a hearing, a written objection and serving a copy of the objection upon the person seeking such status and upon all other parties of record in accordance with section 4-61dd-5(c) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies and section 4-177a of the Connecticut General Statutes." Definition List Intervening Cause - definitions.uslegal.com/i/intervening-cause/From this link below- definitions.uslegal.com/i/intervenor/
|
|
|
Post by soldierboy on Jul 20, 2007 10:59:46 GMT -5
makes sense to me now...so if we are involved with kardall but as a whole then when they made up their agreement that birth and baptismals were going to be main items of interest, does this apply to us since we now have our own lawyer? Can she impose accetable documents under her own conditions according to court procedures and what have you...like what jimmy said that you would be able to use all...I would agree that using all seems more ligit then just only being bale to use 2 items.
|
|